I missed his nomination somewhere and formally recind my support for Luongo.
I think there is an interesting argument for Luongo as injury/suckage protection on Brodeur, but Kipper stands a chance of being one of the top dogs, and two is better than one.
Bob thinks that I should go with Getzlaf instead of Radulov but I figure the Russians enjoy piling up the pts in the round robin more than the Canadians do so I'll keep with him.
8 comments:
Please advise if any changes before noon Tuesday
Kopitar is Slovenian, and since Slovenia isn't in the tournament I reccomend the OOCC consider a replacement (Perry!).
As for a goalie other than Luongo to backup the OOCC, my impression is the options are rather limited.
Looking forward to some Olympic Hockey! Will be a nice break from Flames hockey - especially if Canada wins gold.
Well can we get a new nominee from Mike?
Also the OOC needs to pick between Luongo and Kipper as goalie #2...
For the CC - any objection to Nabokov/Lundqvist (specifically anyone prefer Miller)?
Appreciate any help finalizing these
I promote Kipper!
I missed his nomination somewhere and formally recind my support for Luongo.
I think there is an interesting argument for Luongo as injury/suckage protection on Brodeur, but Kipper stands a chance of being one of the top dogs, and two is better than one.
Echo the comments re Kopitar. Go with Perry.
Bob thinks that I should go with Getzlaf instead of Radulov but I figure the Russians enjoy piling up the pts in the round robin more than the Canadians do so I'll keep with him.
Agree with Kipper over Luongo, however.
I will replace Kopitar with Perry.
I also vote for Kipper.
Fellow Calgary conference members: I fully support Lundqvist over Miller... I think Sweden has better chance of going further than US does.
I think goalie stats should remain same as FUNHL method, but no big deal if consencus is that we go with non-FUNHL method for this.
Post a Comment