Now that the last of the original DC has resigned why do we not implement a suggestion of a couple of years ago that the DC is composed of 3 members each serving a staggarded 3 year term so that each year we have one new DC member.
A previous DC member must have a one year break between 3 year terms.
Someone will replace Dan this year.
Either Bob or I will drop next year ( not sure who has served longer on this current stretch)
Bob or I drop the following year. (Dan could now serve again after a 3 year wait)
9/08/2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Being on the DC seems a pretty thankless job and while I understand that Dan's resignation from the DC invalidates rule 48.1, rule 48 still stands. The DC is composed of 3 GMs selected prior to the ED. It's an annual position (now that the final permanent member has resigned).
I vote against this proposal.
Post a Comment